
This is best evidenced by the plight of staffers who are working as security at the stadiums. BBC covered the story on Wednesday, June 16th (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/africa/10329679.stm), but it has since fallen out of the headlines. The article explains how workers are suffering 15- to 18-hour shifts, being paid wages below their contracted amounts, and even having paychecks withheld by their employer, Stallion. For a company that prides itself for “[caring] about the wellbeing and safety of its staff,” these allegations should be even more embarrassing.
But it gets even worse: since the reporting of the strikes, Stallion has fired thousands of these workers, many of who believed these jobs were their chance to benefit from the country’s and continent’s first World Cup. Stallion blames the workers for trying to hold the World Cup ransom and accusing them of “not being patriotic [sic].” Honestly, Stallion thinks the workers should just suck it up not to embarrass their nation? I for one believe it is Stallion and the South African officials who are doing their country the disservice.
At a time when world attention is drawn upon a global celebration of talent, how shameful is our collected failure to address these conditions.

But maybe it’s just me who believes 15-hour work days are unreasonable?
Speaking about rights in South Africa, NPR aired a story yesterday on Talk of the Nation about a new documentary on South Africa's land reform initiatives, the problems and limits: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1126
ReplyDeleteIt sounds as if land reform has proceeded cautiously to avoid the problems that are occurring in Zimbabwe's rapid expropriations of land from white farmers, but South Africa's land reforms have resulted in little change for black South Africans and resentment among white South African farmers. If you can, check out the film.